The Pied-a-Terre Tax Is Making A Comeback. Is The Third Time The Charm?

US-LIFESTYLE-REALESTATE-GRIFFING

Billionaire Ken Griffin's penthouse purchase (pictured here) reignited talks of a pied-a-terre tax in New York earlier this year. Sen. Brad Hoylman plans to bring the bill back in 2020. (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY / AFP) (Photo credit should

AFP/Getty Images

The pied-a-terre tax has reared its head again, with New York Senator Brad Hoylman announcing a renewed fervor to see his bill through to fruition. 

The tax, which would add an additional, one-time charge on high-priced non-primary residence purchases, has been part of major budget talks since billionaire Ken Griffin’s $238 million penthouse purchase early this year. Though the tax didn’t make it into the final state budget passed in April, Hoylman—the senator who originally introduced the bill in 2014—told The Real Deal this week that’s he’s bringing it back to the floor come 2020.

On Wednesday afternoon, Holyman tweeted, “As long as billionaires are buying apartments in our city, taking advantage of our infrastructure and pushing longtime residents out of their neighborhoods so they can have $238 million mansions in the sky, we’ll need a pied-à-terre tax. It is definitely coming back next year.”

The bill originally met strong opposition from New York’s real estate scene, though Governor Andrew Cuomo, New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer and a slew of other state representatives appeared to back it.

The backlash was enough to get the tax removed from the 2019 budget, but an increased mansion tax, plus a new transfer tax, did make it through. According to the Citizens Budget Commission, the new taxes will generate about $365 million per year for the state.

Though an additional pied-a-terre tax would certainly create a windfall at the outset of its adoption, according to Michael J. Franco, a New York City-based broker with Compass, the move could have a snowball effect, taking real estate prices—and tax revenues—down with them.

“Ultimately, it will negatively impact values in New York by deterring pied-a-terre buyers, which means fewer sales and fewer transfer taxes—or transfer taxes measured at lower values because of the resulting downward pressure on pricing,” Franco said. “The flurry of activity in June prior to the increase in transfer taxes is clear evidence of the impact of such legislation on buyers. The pied-a-terre tax could have a serious chilling effect on the New York luxury market, the impact of which could trickle down to the entire market.”

According to Adam Swanson, a real estate attorney with McCarter & English, changing demographic trends plus a possible recession could also compound the issue.

“Everything I am reading is suggesting that many New York City millennials are looking for alternatives and moving to smaller cities like Stamford, New Rochelle and White Plains—which still have the urban appeal but afford a little more space for families,” Swanson said. “If that is true, there will be a greater supply of housing in the City which should reduce pricing overall. This, coupled with talk of a possible rescession could soften the market, and adding a pied-a-terre tax now might only exacerbate a softening market.”

Jonas Shaende, chief economist at the Fiscal Policy Institute, said the levy would be a “small step toward tax fairness in New York.” The FPI released a report in March showing the pied-a-terre tax could bring anywhere from $490 to $650 million in new revenues for the state.

“As proposed, the tax would only affect a small segment of the real estate market and its overall effect can reasonably be expected to be negligible,” Shaende said. “As rents continue to rise, outpacing the average income, the pied-à-terre tax is a small and sensible step toward a more equitable marketplace allowing all New Yorkers the opportunity to afford a home. As a new revenue stream, the tax could be a welcome addition to funding the city’s public services."

The bill is currently with the Cities Committee. Senator Robert Jackson, the committee’s chair, has called it the “perfect opportunity to increase funding to public education.”

">

The pied-a-terre tax has reared its head again, with New York Senator Brad Hoylman announcing a renewed fervor to see his bill through to fruition. 

The tax, which would add an additional, one-time charge on high-priced non-primary residence purchases, has been part of major budget talks since billionaire Ken Griffin’s $238 million penthouse purchase early this year. Though the tax didn’t make it into the final state budget passed in April, Hoylman—the senator who originally introduced the bill in 2014—told The Real Deal this week that’s he’s bringing it back to the floor come 2020.

On Wednesday afternoon, Holyman tweeted, “As long as billionaires are buying apartments in our city, taking advantage of our infrastructure and pushing longtime residents out of their neighborhoods so they can have $238 million mansions in the sky, we’ll need a pied-à-terre tax. It is definitely coming back next year.”

The bill originally met strong opposition from New York’s real estate scene, though Governor Andrew Cuomo, New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer and a slew of other state representatives appeared to back it.

The backlash was enough to get the tax removed from the 2019 budget, but an increased mansion tax, plus a new transfer tax, did make it through. According to the Citizens Budget Commission, the new taxes will generate about $365 million per year for the state.

Though an additional pied-a-terre tax would certainly create a windfall at the outset of its adoption, according to Michael J. Franco, a New York City-based broker with Compass, the move could have a snowball effect, taking real estate prices—and tax revenues—down with them.

“Ultimately, it will negatively impact values in New York by deterring pied-a-terre buyers, which means fewer sales and fewer transfer taxes—or transfer taxes measured at lower values because of the resulting downward pressure on pricing,” Franco said. “The flurry of activity in June prior to the increase in transfer taxes is clear evidence of the impact of such legislation on buyers. The pied-a-terre tax could have a serious chilling effect on the New York luxury market, the impact of which could trickle down to the entire market.”

According to Adam Swanson, a real estate attorney with McCarter & English, changing demographic trends plus a possible recession could also compound the issue.

“Everything I am reading is suggesting that many New York City millennials are looking for alternatives and moving to smaller cities like Stamford, New Rochelle and White Plains—which still have the urban appeal but afford a little more space for families,” Swanson said. “If that is true, there will be a greater supply of housing in the City which should reduce pricing overall. This, coupled with talk of a possible rescession could soften the market, and adding a pied-a-terre tax now might only exacerbate a softening market.”

Jonas Shaende, chief economist at the Fiscal Policy Institute, said the levy would be a “small step toward tax fairness in New York.” The FPI released a report in March showing the pied-a-terre tax could bring anywhere from $490 to $650 million in new revenues for the state.

“As proposed, the tax would only affect a small segment of the real estate market and its overall effect can reasonably be expected to be negligible,” Shaende said. “As rents continue to rise, outpacing the average income, the pied-à-terre tax is a small and sensible step toward a more equitable marketplace allowing all New Yorkers the opportunity to afford a home. As a new revenue stream, the tax could be a welcome addition to funding the city’s public services."

The bill is currently with the Cities Committee. Senator Robert Jackson, the committee’s chair, has called it the “perfect opportunity to increase funding to public education.”

Follow me on Twitter or LinkedIn. Check out my website.

I'm a freelance writer and journalist from Houston, covering real estate, mortgage and finance topics. See my current work in Forbes, The Motley Fool, The Balance, Bank

...